What do Oromo protests mean for Ethiopian unity? (BBC)

People mourn the death a man who was shot dead by the Ethiopian forces the day earlier, in the Yubdo Village, about 100km from Addis Ababa in the Oromia region, on 17 December 2015

9 March 2016 (BBC) As protests in Ethiopia over the rights of the country’s Oromo people continue, Addis Ababa-based journalist James Jeffrey considers if they are threatening the country’s unity.

The latest round of bloody protests over Oromo rights had a tragically surreal beginning.

A bus filled with a wedding party taking the bride to the groom’s home was stopped at a routine checkpoint on 12 February near the southern Ethiopian town of Shashamane.

Local police told revellers to turn off the nationalistic Oromo music playing. They refused and the bus drove off.

The situation then rapidly escalated and reports indicate at least one person died and three others were injured after police fired shots.

The exact details of the incident are hard to verify, but what is clear is that days of protest followed, including armed local militia clashing with federal police, leaving seven policemen dead, the government says.

Oromia at a glance:

Map of Ethiopia
  • Oromia is Ethiopia’s largest region, surrounding the capital, Addis Ababa
  • Oromo are Ethiopia’s biggest ethnic group – making up about a third of Ethiopia’s 95 million people
  • The Oromo Federalist Congress (OFC) is Oromia’s largest legally registered political party, but holds no seats in parliament

Why Ethiopia is making a historic ‘master plan’ U-turn

Since last November, Ethiopia has seen a third phase of the recent unrest in the Oromia region which has been unprecedented in its longevity and geographical spread.

The region is the largest in Ethiopia and the Oromos, who make up a third of the population, are the biggest of the country’s more than 80 ethnic groups.

Initially the protests were in reaction to a plan to expand the administrative border of the capital, Addis Ababa, which is encircled by Oromia.

But even after the region’s governing party, the Oromo People’s Democratic Organisation, which is part of Ethiopia’s governing coalition, shelved the plan in January, protests have continued.

Historical scars

“There is a strong sense of victimhood, extending back 150 years,” says Daniel Berhane, a prominent Addis Ababa-based political blogger, covering Ethiopia for the website Horn Affairs.

“People remember the history. The scars are still alive, such as how the Oromo language was suppressed until 20 years ago.”

Despite there being an ethnic basis to these protests, observers say that the deeper issues behind them, frustrations over land ownership, corruption, political and economic marginalisation, are familiar to many disenchanted Ethiopians.

People mourn the death of Dinka Chala who was shot dead by the Ethiopian forces the day earlierImage copyrightAFP

Image captionThe government has disputed the numbers given for those killed in the protests by rights groups

The numbers killed since November following clashes between protesters and security forces given by international rights organisations, activists and observers range from 80 to 250.

The government has dismissed various death tolls as exaggerations, and said that a recent report on the situation by the New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) was an “absolute lie“.

‘Organised gangs’

Ethiopian citizens had a right to question the plan to expand Addis Ababa, but the protests were hijacked by people looking to incite violence, according to government spokesman Getachew Reda.

He says the security forces have faced “organised armed gangs burning down buildings belonging to private citizens, along with government installations”.

A security analyst who closely watches Ethiopia says “there could be radical elements and factions taking advantage, but you cannot define a movement by isolated events”.

Despite violent incidents, the protests have been described as “largely peaceful” by HRW and observers in Ethiopia.

“There is a perception of lack of competence in governance on the ground,” Mr Daniel says.

“There were easy remedies to appease initial protests, it was not hard science, but the right actions were not taken.”

In its defence, the government says it heeded the call of the people when it came to concerns over the Addis Ababa plan, and observers say the government deserves credit for withdrawing it.

Oromo protester in MaltaImage copyrightReuters

Image captionOromos in the diaspora have taken part in protests in solidarity

But the same political observers add that the government must allow Ethiopians to exercise their constitutional right to protest, and handle events in a way that does not escalate violence.

The government has said that the protests and information about them have been manipulated by foreign-based opposition groups who are using social media to exaggerate what is going on for their own ends.

“The diaspora magnifies news of what is happening, yes, but no matter how much it agitates, it cannot direct [what’s happening] at village level in Ethiopia,” says Jawar Mohammed, executive director of one of those accused of fomenting conflict, US-based broadcaster Oromia Media Network (OMN).

“This is about dissatisfaction.”

An Ethiopian woman casts her ballot on May 24, 2015Image copyrightAFP

Image captionThe ruling coalition and its allies won every single seat at the 2015 election

Mr Jawar says the imprisonment of leaders of the Oromo Federalist Congress party, Oromia’s largest legally registered opposition political party, along with thousands of other Oromo political prisoners, makes it difficult to negotiate a lasting solution.

“Also what is the UK and US doing? As major donors to Ethiopia they should be taking the lead to get the government to work out an agreement.”

This is a long way from the heady days of Ethiopia’s new federal constitution after the overthrow of the military dictatorship in 1991.

That introduced a decentralised system of ethnic federalism, but this jars with the dominance of the governing Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), which, along with its allies, holds every seat in parliament.

Federal tensions

“The ruling government is a victim of its own success,” the security analyst says.

An Ethiopian wearing traditional Oromo costume is pictured at the Prime Minister's Palace as he pays his respects in Addis Ababa on August 31, 2012. Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles ZenawiImage copyrightAFP

Image captionThe Oromo make up Ethiopia’s largest ethnic group

“The constitution it developed made promises and people trusted the EPRDF. Now people are demanding those rights and the government is responding with bullets and violence.”

He adds that the government has expanded basic services and infrastructure, and appears to respect different cultural and ethnic identities, but it cannot reconcile this with its more authoritarian decision-making process.

The government’s hitherto successful job of holding together this particularly heterogeneous federation is not about to crumble, according to observers here.

But things may get worse before they get better, unless underlying sources of friction and frustration are addressed.

Share Button
Disclaimer: We are not responsible for any losses or damages that may have caused by using our services. EMF declines all responsibility for the contents of the materials stored by users. Each and every user is solely responsible for the posts.
Posted by on March 9, 2016. Filed under NEWS. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

One Response to What do Oromo protests mean for Ethiopian unity? (BBC)

  1. Abegaz Wondimu Reply

    March 10, 2016 at 3:26 PM

    “People remember the history. The scars are still alive, such as how the Oromo language was suppressed until 20 years ago.”!! This is utter nonsense and a lie, and Daniel’s prominence is simply because he is an enlightened supporter of the regime.

    The only difference about the protests in Oromia from what has been occurring in different parts of the country is that they have been sustained for an extended period of time despite the attempt by the government to violently suppress them. Hundreds have been brutally murdered, yet the protests continue.

    The fundamental issue driving protests in the country is the behavior and actions of the authoritarian regime, whose lip service to democracy and good governance is just that, lip service!People seem to be fed-up with the regime’s hollow promises. After being in power for a quarter of a century the regime can not deliver on its promise of democracy and good governance, and has increasingly become authoritarian. The level of brutality the government has unleashed on peaceful demonstrators has started to bring comparison to the worst days of the Derg.
    It has increasingly become clear that rights expressly granted in the constitution are being undermined daily and as Tom Clark noted ‘nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *